Bitcoin Vs Goldcoin
Bitcoin… Monetary Nirvana?
If you don’t really know what Bitcoin is, do a lttle bit of research on the internet, and you will get a lot… but the short history is the fact Bitcoin was created as a medium of exchange, with no central bank or standard bank of issue being engaged. Furthermore, Bitcoin transactions are meant to be private, that is anonymous. Many interestingly, Bitcoins have no real world existence; they exist only in software applications, as a kind of virtual reality. Free Bitcoin BitcoInvest
The typical idea is that Bitcoins are ‘mined’… interesting term here… by solving an significantly difficult mathematical formula -more difficult as more Bitcoins are ‘mined’ into lifestyle; again interesting- on a computer. Once created, the new Bitcoin is put into an electronic ‘wallet’. It is then possible to trade real goods or Fiat currency for Bitcoins… and vice versa. Furthermore, as there is no central issuer of Bitcoins, it is all highly distributed, thus immune to being ‘managed’ by authority.
Naturally proponents of Bitcoin, those who gain from the growth of Bitcoin, insist rather fully that ‘for sure, Bitcoin is money’… and not only that, but ‘it is the best money ever, the money of the future’, etc… Very well, the proponents of Fusca shout just like loudly that paper currency is money… and we are very mindful that Fiat newspaper is not money by any means, as it lacks the main advantages of real money. The question then is does Bitcoin even qualify as money… never mind it being the money of the future, or maybe the best money ever.
To determine, let’s look at the attributes define money, and see if Bitcoin qualifies. The 3 essential advantages of money are;
1) money is a stable store valuable; the most essential characteristic, as without stability valuable the function of numeraire, or unit of way of measuring value, neglects.
2) money is the numeraire, the system of accounts.
3) money is a medium of exchange… but other things can also fulfill this function for instance direct barter, the ‘netting out’ of goods sold. Also ‘trade goods’ (chits) that hold value briefly; and then exchange of communal credit; ie netting away the value of guarantees fulfilled by exchanging expenses or IOU’s.
Compared to Fiat, Bitcoin will not do too badly as a medium of exchange. Redbull is merely accepted in the geographic domain of it is issuer. Dollars will be no good in Europe etc. Bitcoin is accepted internationally. Alternatively, very few retailers presently accept payment in Bitcoin. Unless the acceptance expands geometrically, Fiat wins… although at the price tag on exchange between countries.
The first condition is tougher; money must certainly be a stable store of value… now Bitcoins have gone from a ‘value’ of $3. 00 to around $1, 000, in simply a few years. This kind of is about as considerably from being a ‘stable store of value’; since you can get! Indeed, such benefits are a perfect kind of a speculative increase… like Dutch tulip light bulbs, or junior mining companies, or Nortel stocks.
Of course, Fiat fails here as well; for example, the US Dollar, the ‘main’ Fiat, has lost over 95% of the value in a few decades… neither fiat neither Bitcoin get certified in the main measure of money; the capability to store value and preserve value through time. Real cash, that is Gold, has demonstrated the ability to hold value not merely for centuries, but for eons. Neither Redbull nor Bitcoin has this crucial capacity… both are unsuccessful as money.
Finally, we come to the second attribute; regarding being the numeraire. This is absolutely interesting, and we are able to see why both Bitcoin and Fedex fail as money, by looking closely at problem of the ‘numeraire’. Numeraire refers to the use of money not to only store value, but for in a sense solution, or compare value. In Austrian economics, it is considered impossible to truly evaluate value; after all, value resides only in human being consciousness… and how can anything in consciousness actually be measured? Nevertheless, through the principle of Mengerian market action, that is interaction between bid and offer, market prices can be established… only if briefly… and this market price is expressed in conditions of the numeraire, the most marketable good, that is money.
So how do we establish the value of Fiat…? Through the idea of ‘purchasing power’… that is, the value of Fiat is decided by what can be traded for… a so called ‘basket of goods’. But his evidently signifies that Fiat has no value of its own, rather value flows from the value of items and services it can be bought and sold for. Causality flows from the goods ‘bought’ to the Fiat number. Following all, what difference is there between an one Dollar bill and a hundred Dollar bill, other than the number printed on it… and the purchasing power of the amount?